A review you can follow from source to decision
A useful assessment finding needs context: which requirement is being considered, what the supplied material says, and what the reviewer needs to establish next. Conformo's public MDR checker demonstrates this workflow on a focused excerpt.
| Review step | What you can inspect |
|---|---|
| Define the scope | Choose a device-description excerpt and see the six selected Annex II requirements before checking it. |
| Inspect the evidence | Read the quoted passage and its paragraph reference alongside the requirement and explanation. |
| Apply human judgment | Agree, disagree, request more evidence, and add a review note to each finding. |
| Keep the review record | Export a Markdown report containing the scope, findings, evidence references, and your notes. |
Start with your team's assessment work
Technical reviewers need to understand the evidence behind a finding. Assessment coordinators need to understand what is ready for review and what is still unresolved. A product conversation starts with those responsibilities and the steps your team wants to improve.
- Bring a representative, redacted review workflow and the roles involved.
- Identify where evidence searches, unclear references, and repeated questions slow the work.
- Discuss required scheme coverage, access controls, integrations, and review records before choosing a deployment.
Evaluate the review workflow alongside your audit tools
Certification body software and general audit-management software can overlap. Evaluate the actual workflow rather than the category name: can a reviewer connect an observation to its requirement and source, record a decision, and retain the resulting review record?
See how the workflow fits your team
Book a focused 30-minute conversation about your assessment process. We will discuss your evidence-review needs, show the relevant workflow, and identify the questions a pilot should answer.